Details
-
Type:
Improvement Request
-
Status:
Resolved
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: 5.5.0
-
Fix Version/s: 5.6.0
-
Component/s: None
-
Security Level: Public
-
- Environment:
- -
Issue Links
| Depends | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||
Activity
| Field | Original Value | New Value |
|---|---|---|
| Status | New [ 10000 ] | Open [ 10002 ] |
| Priority | Major [ 3 ] | |
| Assignee | Christophe DENEUX [ cdeneux ] | Victor NOËL [ vnoel ] |
| Status | Open [ 10002 ] | In Progress [ 10003 ] |
| Description | According to the JBI specification, it is the responsibility of the component to take care its own state in case of failure of init and start. |
The JBI specification is not so clear about that, but it is relevant to think it is the responsibility of the component to take care its own state in case of failure of init and start.
So, mirroring the behaviour of the CDK in |
| Link |
This issue blocks |
| Description |
The JBI specification is not so clear about that, but it is relevant to think it is the responsibility of the component to take care its own state in case of failure of init and start.
So, mirroring the behaviour of the CDK in |
The JBI specification is not so clear about that, but it is relevant to think it is the responsibility of the component to take care its own state in case of failure of init and start.
So, mirroring the behaviour of the CDK in In opposition with |
| Status | In Progress [ 10003 ] | Resolved [ 10004 ] |
| Fix Version/s | 5.6.0 [ 10611 ] | |
| Resolution | Fixed [ 1 ] |